People and responsibilities
Who contributes the facts? Who speaks for the company? Who approves source use or final wording? Start with one team and an explicit owner for each decision.
For complex and sensitive organizations
Bring your data, review, identity, and infrastructure requirements. We’ll assess a practical path, including private or on-premise deployment where feasible.
The problem
In a company of around 100 people, a communication team can spend its time chasing experts. A useful first workflow brings together a permitted contribution, an accurate explanation, and the right person to review it.
What we scope together
Who contributes the facts? Who speaks for the company? Who approves source use or final wording? Start with one team and an explicit owner for each decision.
Define allowed sources, excluded material, attribution, read access, AI use, retention, and deletion. An internal source does not automatically become public material.
Specify hosting, networking, identity, model, email, and external connection needs. Isolation or on-premise requirements need an assessment of these dependencies.
Agree on a useful first deliverable, its quality, the review effort, and operational responsibilities. A successful limited scope should precede a wider rollout.
Private and on-premise hosting
On-premise deployment is a scope to assess, not an available turnkey offering today. We need to confirm external dependencies, identity requirements, operations, upgrades, and support before committing.
We do not claim unverified certification, air-gapped availability, or service commitments. The conversation should produce a feasible scope and explicit acceptance criteria.